M. Knapp et al., HOME-BASED VERSUS HOSPITAL-BASED CARE FOR SERIOUS MENTAL-ILLNESS - CONTROLLED COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDY OVER 4 YEARS, British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 1998, pp. 506-512
Background The Daily Living Programme (DLP) offered intensive home-bas
ed care with problem-centred case management for seriously mentally il
l people facing crisis admission to the Maudsley Hospital, London. The
cost effectiveness of the DLP was examined over four years. Method A
randomised controlled study examined cost-effectiveness of DLP versus
standard in/out-patient hospital care over 20 months, followed by a ra
ndomised controlled withdrawal of half the DLP patients into standard
care. Three patient groups were compared over 45 months: DLP throughou
t the period, DLP for 20 months followed by standard care. and standar
d care throughout. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted
(the latter to standardise for possible inter-sample differences stemm
ing from sample attrition and to explore sources of within-sample vari
ation). Results The DLP was more cost-effective than control care over
months 1-20. and also over the full 45-month period, but the differen
ce between groups may have disappeared by the end of month 45. Conclus
ions The reduction of the cost-effectiveness advantage for home-based
care was perhaps partly due to the attenuation of DLP care, although s
ample attrition left some comparisons under-powered.