PHASE-II TRIAL FOR INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN PLUS INTRAVENOUS-SODIUM THIOSULFATE IN ADVANCED OVARIAN-CARCINOMA PATIENTS WITH MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE AFTER CISPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY - A PHASE-II STUDY OF THE EORTC GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER COOPERATIVE GROUP
Jp. Guastalla et al., PHASE-II TRIAL FOR INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN PLUS INTRAVENOUS-SODIUM THIOSULFATE IN ADVANCED OVARIAN-CARCINOMA PATIENTS WITH MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE AFTER CISPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY - A PHASE-II STUDY OF THE EORTC GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER COOPERATIVE GROUP, European journal of cancer, 30A(1), 1994, pp. 45-49
On the basis of its efficacy against ovarian carcinoma and its safe pe
ritoneal administration, cisplatin administered by the intraperitoneal
route was studied in a phase II multicentric trial. 34 patients with
good performance status and residual disease less than 1 cm were treat
ed with a 90 mg/m(2) dose (60 mg/m(2) at first cycle), administered in
the abdominal cavity every 3 weeks for at least four cycles. In case
of haematological or renal toxicity, intravenous sodium thiosulphate w
as perfused simultaneously with intraperitoneal cisplatin with protect
ive intent. 25 patients were evaluable for response: 3 patients had pa
thological complete response and 1 patient had a microscopic disease (
16% response rate in evaluable patients). Systemic toxicity was mild,
and sodium thiosulphate clearly protected against leucopenia (6 patien
ts) and renal toxicity (8 patients). Local side-effects were evaluable
in 34 patients with 2 cases of infectious peritonitis, 1 of wound inf
ection and 2 of haemorrhage. Of the 147 evaluable chemotherapy cycles,
nine resulted in partial and one in total inflow obstruction, for whi
ch 4 patients needed surgical procedures for catheter-related complica
tions, and 1 patient died of acute abdominal complications after such
a procedure. We conclude that 90 mg/m(2) intraperitoneal cisplatin has
activity in pretreated patients with minimal residual disease, and th
at thiosulphate protects against haematological and renal toxicities.
Only a randomised study can demonstrate a true benefit, which will hav
e to be balanced with the toxicity of intraperitoneal drug administrat
ion.