V. Chevron et al., UNPLANNED EXTUBATION - RISK-FACTORS OF DEVELOPMENT AND PREDICTIVE CRITERIA FOR REINTUBATION, Critical care medicine, 26(6), 1998, pp. 1049-1053
Objectives: To define patients at risk for unplanned extubation; to as
sess the influence of nursing workload on the incidence of unplanned e
xtubation; and to determine predictive criteria for pa patients requir
ing reintubation. Design: A prospective, case control study, with 10 a
nd 15 mos of data collection. Setting: University medical intensive ca
re department. Patients: In the first study, which lasted 10 mos, unpl
anned extubation occurred in 40 (14%) of 281 ventilated and intubated
patients; 36 cases were sufficiently documented to be compared with 74
intubated and ventilated controls. In the second study, which lasted
15 mos, the reintubated patients (n = 23) of a series of 62 unplanned
extubation patients were compared with those who were not reintubated
(n = 39). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The foll
owing parameters were recorded: gender, age, main reason for admission
, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, route of intubation (oral or n
asotracheal), tube diameter, ventilatory mode, Flo(2),, frequency and
tidal volume delivered by the ventilator immediately before unplanned
extubation, arterial blood gases performed 24 hrs before unplanned ext
ubation, the presence of any sedation with, in this case, the last Ram
say score, the presence of hand restraints, the presence of weaning of
ventilation, the accidental or deliberate nature of unplanned extubat
ion, the Glasgow Coma Score at the time of unplanned extubation, the d
uration of ventilation before unplanned extubation, total duration of
ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit, and the patient's sur
vival or death. The nursing workload was evaluated using a score deriv
ed from the Project de Recherche en Nursing and adapted to intensive c
are. Unplanned extubation patients were more frequently intubated oral
ly than controls (33.3% vs. 14.9%, respectively; p<.05). In the popula
tion of sedated patients, unplanned extubation patients were more freq
uently agitated than controls (60% vs. 19%, respectively; p<.05). The
nursing workload did not differ between days with and days without unp
lanned extubation. Twenty-three (37%) of the 62 cases of documented un
planned extubation were reintubated. Predictive factors of reintubatio
n are, in decreasing order of importance: Glasgow Coma Score of <11, a
ccidental nature of unplanned extubation, and a Pao(2)/Flo(2), ratio <
200 torr (<26.7 kPa). Conclusions: Patients at risk for unplanned extu
bation are characterized by oral intubation and insufficient sedation.
In the department studied, and with the specific score used, we did n
ot observe a relationship between the nursing workload and the inciden
ce of unplanned extubation. A Glasgow Coma Score of <11, the accidenta
l nature of unplanned extubation, and a Pao(2)/Flo(2), ratio <200 torr
(<26.7 kPa) are factors associated with a risk of reintubation.