Objectives: To evaluate the effects of inhaled prostacyclin (PGI(2)) a
nd inhaled as well as intravenous prostaglandin E-1 (PGE(1)) on thromb
oxane A(2) mimetic-induced pulmonary vasoconstriction, Active pulmonar
y vasoconstriction was to be distinguished from passive resistance to
blood flow. Design: Prospective, randomized, crossover study, Setting:
Experimental animal laboratory. Subjects: Eight anesthetized and para
lyzed sheep. Interventions: The stable thromboxane A(2) mimetic, U4661
9, was infused in increasing dosage to obtain a stable pulmonary hyper
tension of similar to 30 mm Hg. Subsequently, PGE(1) aerosol (0.6, 6,
58, 259 ng/kg/min), intravenous PGE(1) (0.5 mu g/kg/min), or PGI(2) ae
rosol (27 ng/kg/min) were administered in randomized order. Measuremen
ts and Main Results: Active pulmonary vasoconstriction was assessed by
determining the pulmonary pressure flow relationship (PPFR), For meas
urement of pulmonary artery flow, an ultrasound flow probe was placed
around the pulmonary artery after a sternotomy, Pulmonary arterial pre
ssure was measured with a pulmonary artery flotation catheter, Flow wa
s varied by partial occlusion of the inferior vena cava or incremental
opening of an arterio-venous fistula between the large neck vessels.
The primary end points were the slope of the resulting linear pressure
flow relationship, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), Infusion
of U46619 increased the slope of the PPFR (2.9 +/- 0.7 vs, 4.2 t 1.2 m
m Hg/L/min [median +/- semi interquartile range]; p less than or equal
to.05), and PVR (221 +/- 20 vs. 424 +/- 57 dyne.sec/cm(5)) (p<.05), N
either dose of PGE(1) aerosol induced changes of the slope of PPFR or
PVR, In contrast, intravenous administration of the same drug reduced
the slope of the PPFR (4.0 +/- 1.0 vs, 3.1 +/- 0.4) (p <.05) but left
PVR unchanged. Inhalation of PGI, reduced both the slope of the PPFR,
slightly but significantly, and PVR (424 +/- 98 vs. 323 +/- 26 dyne.se
c/ cm(5)) (p <.05). Conclusions: This study is the first to show reduc
tion of active pulmonary vasoconstriction by PGI(2) aerosol, Neither i
nhalation nor intravenous administration of PGE(1) reduced PVR but the
latter reduced the slope of PPFR. We conclude that PGE(1) has potenti
al for pulmonary vasodilation, but that it is ineffective as an aeroso
l, even in high doses, in sheep. PVR may fail to reflect drug induced
pulmonary vasodilation.