Information about the effects of subject sampling and variable samplin
g on factor pattern reproduction is critical for both the design of st
udies and the evaluation of existing studies. This article reports bot
h a review of the available literature and the results of 2 new simula
tion studies. Conditions investigated include the average number of va
riables per factor (3:1, 4:1, or 5:1), the sample size (N = 50, 100, 1
50, 200, 400, 800), the method of analysis (principal component analys
is, image component analysis, maximum likelihood factor analysis), pat
tern of loadings (equal or unequal), and the size of the average loadi
ng (.40, .60, .80). A small but consistent pattern of differences betw
een methods occurred. Subject sample size, variable sample size, and s
ize of the loadings can all strongly affect the degree to which a samp
le pattern reproduces the population pattern. The frequency of boundar
y cases in factor analysis is also affected by the same 3 variables. A
minimum of 3 variables per factor is critical. Weaknesses in one area
can be partially compensated for by strengths in another area.