We investigated how men who differ in their-likelihood to sexually har
ass (LSH) are perceived by themselves and others. In Study 1, 36 Cauca
sian male participants, who were paid for their participation, were vi
deotaped being interviewed by a subordinate female. Participants rated
her performance and then responded to self-report attitudinal and per
sonality scales. Higher LSH men reported more traditional attitudes to
ward women's roles, a less feminine personality, and lower competency
ratings for the female interviewer: Study 2 investigated whether parti
cipants could differentiate between high and low LSH men from videocli
ps. Eighty-one male and 76 female Caucasian participants, who were ful
filling a course requirement, rated high LSH men (compared to low LSH
men) as (1) higher in LSH, (2) more masculine, (3) less feminine, and
(4) more traditional toward women's roles than low LSH men. Implicatio
ns of this ability to detect likelihood to sexually harass are discuss
ed.