Ty. Yamani et Aa. Rouzi, VALUE OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY PELVIMETRY IN PATIENTS WITH A PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION, Annals of saudi medicine, 18(1), 1998, pp. 9-11
A case-control study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
, to determine the value of computed tomography pelvimetry in patients
with a previous cesarean section. Between January 1993 and December 1
995, 219 pregnant women with one previous cesarean section met the cri
teria for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. One hundred women had
antenatal CT pelvimetry for assessment of the pelvis. One hundred and
nineteen women did not have CT pelvimetry and served as control. Fift
y-one women (51%) in the CT pelvimetry group delivered by cesarean sec
tion. Twenty-three women (23%) underwent elective cesarean section for
contracted pelvis based upon the findings of CT pelvimetry and 28 wom
en (28%) underwent emergency cesarean section after trial of labor. In
the group who did not have CT pelvimetry, 26 women (21.8%) underwent
emergency cesarean section. This was a statistically significant diffe
rence (P=0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in
birthweight and Apgar scores in either group. There was no perinatal
or maternal mortality in this study. Computed tomography pelvimetry in
creased the rate of cesarean delivery without any benefit in the immed
iate delivery outcomes. Therefore, the practice of documenting the ade
quacy of the pelvis by CT pelvimetry before vaginal birth after cesare
an should be abandoned.