OBJECTIVE: To review the literature regarding the purported associatio
n between oral ingestion of beta-blocker drugs and depressed mood. DAT
A SOURCE: MEDLINE was searched for published articles using the key wo
rds propranolol, atenolol, metoprolol, nadolol, timolol, beta-blocker,
beta-adrenergic antagonist, or beta-adrenergic blocker in combination
with the key words depression, depressive symptomatology, major depre
ssive disorder, or depressed mood from January 1966 through December 1
996. DATA SYNTHESIS: Findings regarding the association are equivocal.
Plausible explanations include study design, case definition, and con
founding disease states. Most of the evidence supporting an associatio
n has used case series and case reports. Findings from cross-sectional
observational studies and case-control studies are equivocal. Case de
finition and measurement instruments may partially explain these incon
sistencies. Studies using a diagnosis of depression generally do not s
upport the relationship. Trials using depressive symptoms are about ev
enly split, but they have generally enrolled a small number of patient
s and have questionable statistical power. Studies defining antidepres
sant prescriptions dispensed as a marker for depression generally supp
ort the association. Evidence exists both for and against the hypothes
is that lipophilic beta-blockers cause more depression than do hydroph
ilic beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: beta-Blockers may have been unjustly
associated with depression and their use avoided for that reason. Futu
re studies into the association between depression and beta-blocker us
e should evaluate whether the association is affected by case definiti
on and study design characteristics, including disease, dose-response,
bias, measurement error, or ability to precisely measure the length o
f the exposure.