ROLE OF PLANIMETRIC ANALYSIS IN DIAGNOSING THYROID FOLLICULAR LESIONSON FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSIES - A STUDY WITH HISTOLOGIC CORRELATION

Citation
G. Fadda et al., ROLE OF PLANIMETRIC ANALYSIS IN DIAGNOSING THYROID FOLLICULAR LESIONSON FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSIES - A STUDY WITH HISTOLOGIC CORRELATION, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology, 20(3), 1998, pp. 192-198
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Cell Biology
ISSN journal
08846812
Volume
20
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
192 - 198
Database
ISI
SICI code
0884-6812(1998)20:3<192:ROPAID>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Follicular lesions represent a gray area of interpretation in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the thyroid, with as much as 25% inconclusive reports. We identified ''predominantly follicular lesions'' (PFLs) as the cytologic category most apt to take advantage of planimetric analysis to reach a more definitive diagnosis. STUDY DE SIGN: Sixty-eight cases of FNAB were diagnosed as PFL among the 1,296 FNABs submitted to our institution between January 1994 and June 1995. These cases under went planimetric analysis with a Leica semiautomati c image analyzer. A smear from a colloid nodule was used as a referenc e slide. Nuclear areas, perimeters, form factors and maximum diameters were evaluated. Cases in which nuclear areas and maximum nuclear diam eters values were found to be greater than or equal to 30% higher than the corresponding values found in the reference slide were reported t o the clinician as suspicious for malignancy (''flagged'' by the compu ter). These cases required closer follow-up with repeat FNAB within a month, ultrasound and nuclear imaging studies. Nineteen of these cases underwent surgical resection. RESULTS: Histologic reports diagnosed 9 cases of follicular carcinomas, 4 cases of follicular adenomas and 6 cases of nodular hyperplasia. When nuclear areas, perimeters and maxim um diameters were all utilized, all the malignant lesions were reporte d correctly by the computer analysis as flagged, and all the benign le sions were reported as ''not flagged.'' The sensitivity and specificit y were 100%, and statistically significant correlations were proven. C ONCLUSION: Although the above data provide strong evidence for the val ue of planimetric analysis in differentiating between follicular lesio ns, toe cannot reach definitive conclusions on the basis of such a lim ited number of cases. However, the results stimulated our current effo rts in applying planimetry along with the evaluation of other biologic markers to a larger set of cases.