I. Rosenthal et al., THE ROLE OF THE COMMUNITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EPAS RULE ON RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS FOR CHEMICAL ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION, Risk analysis, 18(2), 1998, pp. 171-179
Regulations under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) include req
uirements for preventing accidental chemical releases. Section 112(r)
of the CAAA, the Accidental Release Provisions, requires the U.S. Envi
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop and implement regulations
for preventing accidental releases to the air of regulated substances
and to minimize the consequences of releases that do occur. The regul
ations require regulated facilities to have in place the structural el
ements of a sound process safety program, and to practice, document, a
nd communicate the elements of their program. The rule requires also t
hat registered facilities calculate and make available worst case acci
dental chemical release information. The rule does not set a level of
risk that a facility must achieve after it takes the required complian
ce steps, the level of risk a community must accept, the limit of cons
equences the community might suffer from a worst case chemical release
, nor the specific actions a community must take in its response plan.
These are issues that local communities and local officials must deci
de. Because the regulation involves the community in many unsettled ri
sk issues the Wharton School initiated a project within the City Phila
delphia to evaluate the proposition that productive dialogue on the im
plementation of the Rule and resolution of unsettled risk issues can t
ake place in advance of a crisis occasioned by a major accidental rele
ase. This paper describes the steps taken by Wharton to bring together
various stakeholders in the community to explore the implementation o
f the rule and the reaction of those stakeholders to be involved in su
ch a process. It outlines some principal choices communities will have
to make in order to implement 112(r) and explains some of the dilemma
s associated with these choices. It describes the stakeholder-based im
plementation effort being undertaken in Philadelphia in the hope that
others may benefit from what has been learned there.