Regulations under Section 112(r) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments
require fixed facilities having threshold quantities of materials on t
he U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's list of regulated substances
to disclose to the general public the expected offsite consequences o
f worst-case accidental chemical releases. This paper describes the co
mmunication practices of small firms in Delaware and New Jersey and th
e practical problems these facilities might encounter complying with t
he proposed rule. The paper reports an interesting difference between
the apprehension voiced by small firms required to report worst-case r
elease information and the public's apparent lack of interest in such
information. Unlike the difficulty expected by small firms in calculat
ing and communicating worst-case chemical release information, this pa
per includes some observations on the ability of large chemical firms
to comply with the proposed requirements.