G. Kalmar et al., OPTIMAL EXPANSION OF THE MULTILINK STENT - AN IN-VITRO STUDY USING DIRECT MAGNIFICATION RADIOGRAPHY, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 87(5), 1998, pp. 344-352
It has been speculated that high pressure implantation may improve the
results of coronary stenting. However, this method bears the risk of
peristent dissection and may increase late lumen loss. Presently, ther
e is no consensus about the optimal stent implantation technique with
the regard to balloon size and pressure. To elucidate this question an
experimental study was performed in a coronary stenosis model. 3.5 mm
Multi-Link (ML) stents were implanted in 3.3 mm silicone rubber tubes
containing 50% concentric narrowings. Three implantation techniques w
ere applied: 1. The standard technique using the conventional ML deliv
ery system with a compliant balloon (ML-ST). 2. A new deployment metho
d with a high pressure delivery system (ML-HP). 3. ''Focal postdilatio
n'' using the ARC catheter, which has a special balloon with an inner
compliant and an outer non-compliant section (ML-ARC). For comparison,
the Palmaz-Schatz stent was implanted by using a high pressure balloo
n. Stent expansion was imaged by magnification radiography. Minimal lu
men diameter within the stent (MLD) and the lumen diameter outside the
stent (BD) were measured after dilations with 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 2
1 atm. The relation of the ED to the MLD was used as an index of vesse
l trauma. The results lead to following conclusions: 1. A complete app
osition to the vessel wall for a balloon/vessel relation of 1.1:1 coul
d not be reached with pressures below 9-15 atm. The increase of the pr
essure beyond 15 atm resulted only in a minimal additional lumen. 2. C
ompared to the Palmaz-Schatz stent the recoil of the ML stent was sign
ificant lower. 3. For all three implantation techniques the ML-ARC sho
wed the best results with the maximal dilatation of the stenotic vesse
l-area and the minimal expansion of the vessel outside the stent.