Although the use of on-line monitoring of brain ti-pO(2) is increasing
, so far the critical level of 10 mmHg is derived from animal experime
nts and clinical analyses: no hard proof on outcome basis has been giv
en until now. The authors present an outcome analysis of 35 patients w
ith severe head injury. Inclusion criteria were: start of ti-pO(2) mon
itoring less than or equal to 40 h post-injury, the probe lying in CT
scan normal tissue and the GOS at 6 months being available. The good o
utcome group (GOS 4 + 5, n = 17) showed a 17.7 +/- 9.1 h delay from th
e injury to the monitoring compared to the bad outcome group (COS 1-3,
n = 18) with (14.2 +/- 9.1 h) (p < 0.05). Age and initial Glasgow Com
a Score were not different In the bad outcome group there were more pa
tients with a diffuse injury type 3 and 4. The distribution of the ti-
pO(2) values show in all the examined time intervals (day 0-6, 0-72 h,
0-48 h and 0-24 h) a left shift in the bad outcome group with most pr
onounced difference for ti-pO(2) less than or equal to 10 mmHg. For th
e period from 0-48 h and even more from 0-24 h post-injury, the differ
ence between both groups was significant (p = 0.036 and p = 0.013). In
the bad outcome group 35.5% of the values from 0-24 h were less than
or equal to 10 mmHg (compared to 10.6% in the good outcome group. ti-p
O(2) values greater than or equal to 50 mmHg were seen more often in t
he bad outcome group; this occurred mainly after 48-72 h post-injury.
The authors concluded that brain ti-pO(2) monitoring is able to detect
the occurrence of early hypoxic insults. Brain ti-pO(2) monitoring is
an important parameter in the multimodality monitoring system.