Over the past two decades, Australia's State Education Departments and
the public school systems for which they are reponsible have largely
succeeded seemingly to a greater degree than their counterparts in US
and UK-in insulating themselves from harsher forms of centralised educ
ational accountability such as stare testing and school performance co
mparisons. A central goal of this paper will be to try to explain the
politics of this phenomenon which seem inextricably tied to the peculi
arities of Australian federalism and to the remarkable historical domi
nance of education bureaucrats (and Ministers) controlling strongly ce
ntralised State education departments. The explanations for the inabil
ity of the four States analysed in the ensuing case studies to impleme
nt or sustain proposed major state-wide school accountability processe
s is found in powerful teachers unions; changes of government followin
g elections; and, perhaps predominantly, fear by entrenched senior Sta
te education bureaucrats (and Ministers) that accountability processes
and outcomes might produce unwanted scrutiny (from Federal Government
, the public or others), loss of control and embarrassment to themselv
es.