S. Sharma et al., ACCURACY OF VISIBLE RETINAL EMBOLI FOR THE DETECTION OF CARDIOEMBOLICLESIONS REQUIRING ANTICOAGULATION OR CARDIAC-SURGERY, British journal of ophthalmology, 82(6), 1998, pp. 655-658
Aim-To determine the accuracy of visible retinal emboli as a diagnosti
c ''test'' for the likelihood of receiving anticoagulation or cardiac
surgery based on the results of transthoracic echocardiography, in the
setting of acute retinal arterial occlusion. Methods-A multicentre re
trospective diagnostic study at Kingston Eye Centre, Queen's Universit
y, Kingston, Ontario; Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia; Ottawa Eye Ins
titute, Ottawa, Ontario; and the Halifax Infirmary, Halifax, Nova Scot
ia of 104 patients with both embolic and non-embolic acute retinal art
erial obstruction who underwent transthoracic echocardiography was per
formed, to determine the accuracy of visible retinal emboli as a diagn
ostic ''test'' for anticoagulation or cardiac surgery. Anticoagulation
or surgical intervention on the basis of abnormalities was detected s
olely through the technology of transthoracic echocardiography. Result
s-41 patients had visible retinal emboli (calcific, cholesterol, or fi
brin). The remaining 63 had no evidence of embolic disease. The sensit
ivity of emboli for the likelihood of a patient receiving anticoagulat
ion or cardiac surgery was 50%. The specificity, positive predictive v
alue, and negative predictive value were 62%, 15%, and 90%, respective
ly. The likelihood ratio (LR=1.31) obtained given the presence of a vi
sible retinal embolus was neither clinically nor statistically signifi
cant (LR+ve = 1.31; 95% CI (0.91, 3.16)). This likelihood ratio, when
applied to a patient with a pretest probability of 50%, results in a p
ost-test probability of 56.7%. Conclusions-These results demonstrate t
hat the presence of a visible retinal embolus should not be the sole d
eterminant of whether to order transthoracic echocardiography, as the
likelihood ratio for a patient receiving anticoagulation or cardiac su
rgery, given the presence of a visible retinal embolus was only 1.31.