Pa. Allen et al., THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD - EVIDENCE FOR AGE-DIFFERENCES INATTENTIONAL TIME-SHARING, Psychology and aging, 13(2), 1998, pp. 218-229
The authors report 2 psychological refractory period (PRP) experiments
in which the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between Task 1 and Task
2 was 150 ms, 250 ms, 600 ms, and 1,100 ms for both younger and older
adults. H. Pashler's (1994a) response-selection bottleneck theory pred
icts that SOA manipulations should not affect Task 1 performance, but
that reaction time (RT) for Task 2 should increase as the SOA between
the 2 tasks decreases (i.e., the classical PRP effect). In Experiment
1 (Task 1 = tone discrimination, Task 2 = dot location), older adults
showed a larger PRP effect than younger adults did, although Task 1 RT
was affected by SOA, suggesting that participants were grouping their
responses on some trials. That is, participants were holding their re
sponse for Task 1 until they had completed processing Task 2, and then
they responded to both tasks almost simultaneously. However, a subset
of participants (11 younger adults and 11 older adults) who showed no
evidence of response grouping on Task 1 continued to shaw a larger PR
P effect for older adults on Task 2. In Experiment 2 (Task 1 = dot loc
ation, Task 2 = simultaneous letter matching), older adults continued
to show a larger PRP effect than younger adults for Task 2, and Task 1
performance was unaffected by SOA. Consequently, these experiments pr
ovide evidence that older adults (relative to younger adults) exhibit
a decrement in time-sharing at the response-selection stage of process
ing. These results suggest that attentional time-sharing needs to be a
dded to the list of topics examined in aging research on varieties of
attention.