OFFICE AND LABORATORY BLOOD PRESSURES AS PREDICTORS OF DAILY BLOOD-PRESSURE LEVEL IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND BORDERLINE AND MILD HYPERTENSIVE SUBJECTS
S. Majahalme et al., OFFICE AND LABORATORY BLOOD PRESSURES AS PREDICTORS OF DAILY BLOOD-PRESSURE LEVEL IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND BORDERLINE AND MILD HYPERTENSIVE SUBJECTS, Clinical physiology, 18(3), 1998, pp. 215-223
A series of standardized laboratory tests [10 min sitting and supine,
9 min standing, dynamic; cycle ergometer (ERG) and isometric exercise;
handgrip (HG)] were performed during intra-arterial blood pressure (B
P) recording in 97 healthy unmedicated men, initially classified as no
rmotensive (NT, n = 34), borderline hypertensive (BHT, n = 29) or mild
ly hypertensive (HT, n = 34) by repeated office blood pressure (OBP) m
easurements. After testing, a 24-h intra-arterial ambulatory BP (IABP)
recording was obtained while subjects performed their normal activiti
es. Day and night periods were analysed as well as 24-h averages for s
ystolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) using Pearson correlations and
multiple linear regressions. In normotensive subjects, the supine SEP
predicted IABP measurements best (r range 0.39-0.69, P<0.05-0.001). I
n multiple regression, supine SEP explained 49% of 24-h SEP variance (
F = 12.4, P = 0.001). For BHT, supine SEP was also the best predictor
(r range 0.09-0.64, P NS to P<0.001), and it explained 37% of 24-h SEP
variance (F = 15.6, P = 0.0005). In HT, ERG DBP correlated best with
IABP (r range 0.52-0.75, P<0.01-0.001). ERG SEP explained 49% of 24-h
SEP (F = 31.0, P = 0.0000) and ERG DBP explained 56% of 24-h DBP (F =
35.4, P = 0.0000) variance. Laboratory BP correlations were generally
better with day than with night measurements. OSBP correlated moderate
ly well with IABP in NT, and weakly in BHT and HT; ODBP instead correl
ated with IABP in NT and HT but not significantly in BHT. In conclusio
n, OBP is less closely related to IABP than laboratory BP, but even la
boratory BP generally explains less than 50% of IABP variance. Stresso
rs such as exercise are useful only in HT. For BHT, the prediction of
IABP with laboratory measures was even weaker than in other groups, an
d thus ambulatory measurements cannot be replaced by short-duration la
boratory measurements and stress tests.