We. Vanderweide et al., DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A QUALITY ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR OCCUPATIONAL PHYSICIANS, Occupational and environmental medicine, 55(6), 1998, pp. 375-382
Objectives-To develop and apply a method for assessing the quality of
the process of occupational health care for individual patients. Metho
ds-The scientific literature was studied to develop a method to assess
the quality of the process of occupational rehabilitation for workers
with low back pain. The method was applied to health care and univers
ity workers with low back pain who were rehabilitated by their occupat
ional physicians. Results-Assessment of quality of care is regarded as
a four step approach. Firstly, guidelines should be developed and imp
lemented. Secondly, indicators for quality and criteria to demarcate g
ood and deviant quality were derived from the guidelines. Thirdly, a m
ethod for data collection was chosen. Finally, quality was scored. For
occupational rehabilitation, there was some deviance from the guideli
nes for most cases, especially in continuity of care with a deviant ra
te of 47%. Other indicators deviated from 1.4%-17.4%. Occupational phy
sicians agreed on the relevance of the indicators and criteria, but fo
r three indicators they evaluated the criteria as too rigid. They did
not agree with their own performance scores in 66% of the deviant case
s. Conclusion-Assessing the quality of the process of occupational hea
lth tare with this method is an asset to present methods, but more spe
cific criteria are needed for a more sensitive assessment.