RISK ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL CROP PLANTS IN ANALOGY TO TRANSGENIC PLANTS

Citation
H. Torgersen et al., RISK ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL CROP PLANTS IN ANALOGY TO TRANSGENIC PLANTS, Environmental science and pollution research international, 5(2), 1998, pp. 89-93
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences
ISSN journal
09441344
Volume
5
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
89 - 93
Database
ISI
SICI code
0944-1344(1998)5:2<89:RAOCCP>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The risk assessment of genetically-modified plants pursuant to Annex L I B of EU Directive 94/15/EC assumes that it is possible to infer the environmental impacts of a crop plant from its characteristics, so mos t of Annex II should also be applicable to conventional plants. To tes t this, we surveyed reports on the ecological impacts of the cultivati on of non-transgenic crop plants with novel or improved traits and, in three cases, investigated whether Annex II B would have been adequate to indicate the effects. Such an assessment appears to be feasible on ly if the time frame on which it is based is short, so that long-term effects cannot be assessed. Secondly, the plant must be genetically ho mogenous which is not always granted, e.g. with forest-trees. Thirdly, the cultivation area must be defined. Differences in the behaviour of foreign plants between their original and cultivation habitats may be ecologically relevant and should be assessed. In the (few) cases wher e direct inference of the observed effects was possible from inherent traits, these effects often correlated with poor adaptation to local e nvironmental conditions. The ecological impacts of traits that had bee n introduced in order to overcome poor adaptation may differ widely ac cording to the way in which the traits are exploited. In practice, the effects of agricultural measures are more important than the effects of gene transfer and invasiveness, although the latter currently play a major role in risk assessment. In the light of these deliberations, a modification of Annex II B of EU Directive 94/15/EC is suggested.