A. Lindinger et al., PERMANENT JUNCTIONAL REENTRY TACHYCARDIA - A MULTICENTER LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP-STUDY IN INFANTS, CHILDREN AND YOUNG-ADULTS, European heart journal, 19(6), 1998, pp. 936-942
Aims Permanent junctional re-entry tachycardia is a relatively uncommo
n form of re-entry tachycardia with antegrade conduction occurring thr
ough the atrioventricular node and retrograde conduction over an acces
sory pathway usually located in the postero-septal region. It was the
aim of the study to investigate the course of permanent junctional re-
entry tachycardia with particular regard to the effectiveness of pharm
acological treatment and ablation procedures; evaluation was performed
with respect to the patient's symptoms, tachycardia rate, frequency o
f the tachycardia and left ventricular function. Methods and Results T
he long-term follow-up of 32 patients with permanent junctional re-ent
ry tachycardia was evaluated. The first presentation with supraventric
ular tachycardia occurred between the 27th week of gestation and 27 ye
ars. The tachycardia rate ranged from 100 to 250 beats. min(-1). Durin
g Holter-ECG, permanent junctional re-entry tachycardia was documented
as present for over 50% of the time in 24 h in 22 patients (69%). Lef
t ventricular performance was impaired in nine patients (28%) due to a
tachycardia-related cardiomyopathy. Symptoms or signs of heart failur
e were mild to moderate in eight and severe in four patients; 20 patie
nts showed no clinical impairment. Follow-up time was 1 to 31 (mean 10
) years; current age of the patients ranged from 1.5 months to 35 (mea
n=15.3) years. Four patients needed no therapy because of the infreque
ncy of permanent junctional re-entry tachycardia episodes. Twenty-five
patients initially received antiarrhythmic drugs, which were effectiv
e or partially effective in 14 (56%). Eight of them are still on medic
al therapy; in five treatment was discontinued because of absence of s
ymptoms. Eleven patients had ablation of the accessory pathway during
follow-up, three underwent ablation as a primary procedure. Conclusion
Permanent junctional re-entry tachycardia in our experience is an arr
hythmia with a large variety of clinical symptoms. Patients with a slo
w tachycardia rate and infrequent episodes of tachycardia may never de
velop symptoms and therefore do not need any therapy. Patients with fr
equent permanent junctional re-entry tachycardia, a fast tachycardia r
ate and impaired left ventricular function need effective therapy. In
infancy and early childhood medical therapy is recommended as a first
option, whereas in older and symptomatic patients catheter ablation is
an effective and safe procedure.