M. Aubier et al., EFFECT OF SLOW-RELEASE THEOPHYLLINE ON NASAL ANTIGEN CHALLENGE IN SUBJECTS WITH ALLERGIC RHINITIS, The European respiratory journal, 11(5), 1998, pp. 1105-1110
It has been recognized recently that theophylline possesses anti-infla
mmatory effects that could be of clinical interest in patients with ai
rway inflammatory diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR),
The aim of the present study was to explore the effect of theophylline
on the nasal eosinophilic inflammatory response following allergen ch
allenge in patients with AR. Fourteen subjects suffering fi om seasona
l rhinitis with an early reaction after nasal allergen provocation wer
e challenged outside the pollen season after pretreatment for 3 weeks
with placebo or slow-release theophylline (Euphylong(R)) in a randomiz
ed double-blind, cross-ol er study, Nasal blocking index (NBI), nasal
airway resistance and symptoms were recorded before, and 1 and 5 h aft
er challenge; additionally, nasal lavage fluid was collected before, a
s well as 1 and 5 h after challenge. Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP)
was measured in the lavage as well as the number of eosinophils befor
e, and 1 h and 5 h after allergen challenge. After 3 weeks of treatmen
t, baseline concentrations of ECP in nasal lavage amounted to 826+/-32
9 ng.L-1 (placebo) and 936+/-351 ng LI (theophylline). The ECP levels
did not increase during the early phase response. Five hours after cha
llenge, ECP in the placebo group increased markedly (p<0.01), whereas
no significant increase was observed during theophylline treatment. In
parallel, the number of eosinophils in the nasal lavage fluid was lon
er during theophylline treatment. Additionally, theophylline therapy a
lso significantly reduced the nasal symptoms and had some protective e
ffect against nasal obstruction following allergen challenge. These re
sults confirm the anti-inflammatory effects of theophylline and sugges
t that these effects may be of clinical benefit in patients with aller
gic rhinitis.