Pm. Duggan et J. Miller, BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN PREGNANCY - A SURVEY OF METHODS USED INTEACHING HOSPITALS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 38(2), 1998, pp. 197-199
A voluntary, anonymous 10-point multiple choice questionnaire was used
to assess variability in methods used to measure blood pressure in pr
egnancy in 5 South Australian teaching hospitals. Medical and midwifer
y staff working in maternity units attached to teaching hospitals in S
outh Australia were asked to complete a survey of their current practi
ce related to the measurement of blood pressune in pregnant women; 213
replies were received from 440 surveyed (48% response rate). There wa
s a lack of standardization of practice for: positioning of the patien
t, use of the 4th or 5th Korotkoff sound for diastolic blood pressure,
cuff selection, rounding of the measurement, selection of the left or
right arm, and period of premeasurement resting. Systematic errors av
eraging 10-15 mmHg can be expected in measurement of blood pressure in
pregnancy due to failure of standardization of method. There is a nee
d for standardization of method which is not being met by present meth
ods of staff training in teaching hospitals.