D. Rugg et al., SUSCEPTIBILITY OF LABORATORY-SELECTED AND FIELD STRAINS OF THE LUCILIA-CUPRINA (DIPTERA, CALLIPHORIDAE) TO IVERMECTIN, Journal of economic entomology, 91(3), 1998, pp. 601-607
Selection of a composite field strain of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) w
ith ivermectin for more than 60 generations resulted in a significant,
though slight, increase in resistance (<10-fold). This resistance app
eared to increase uniformly over the first 30 generations, then remain
ed roughly constant. The resistance was not stable, and the strain rap
idly reverted toward susceptibility in the absence of selection pressu
re. The selected strain showed some cross-resistance to moxidectin (up
to 5-fold). Larval monooxygenase activity (aldrin epoxidation) was el
evated 2.9-fold in the selected strain compared with the unselected co
ntrol. However, the significance of this elevation is unclear because
higher monooxygenase activities were measured in field-collected strai
ns showing no resistance to ivermectin. Pretreatment with piperonyl bu
toxide caused only a slight increase in toxicity of ivermectin to the
selected strain, whereas triphenyl phosphate and tridiphane showed no
significant synergism. The concentration responses to ivermectin in th
e field-collected strains were similar to a laboratory-susceptible str
ain even though the field strains all showed resistance to diazinon (u
p to 28-fold). The low level of resistance in the selected strain sugg
ests that there is no specific ivermectin resistance mechanism present
in the L. cuprina field strains tested. Current mechanisms of insecti
cide resistance in L. cuprina do not appear to confer any tolerance to
ivermectin, despite the use of the compound for several years as an a
nthelmintic for sheep.