When renal amyloidosis has progressed to end-stage renal failure, most
patients are severely affected by systemic amyloidosis and nephropath
y. An alternative to chronic dialysis is renal transplantation. We pre
sent a patient with amyloid nephropathy who developed recurrent transp
lant amyloidosis. Renal transplantation was performed in 1985 with a l
iving related donor. In 1990 the patient developed amyloidosis of the
graft with membranous nephropathy and tubular acidosis due to hyporeni
nemic hypoaldosteronism. Secondary amyloidosis has been reported to in
volve glandular organs inducing hypothyroidism, hypocortisolism and hy
poaldosteronism. Cyclosporine has been reported to induce hyporeninemi
c hypoaldosteronism and tubular acidosis, but not hypocortisolism and
hypothyroidism. Progression of the amyloidosis of the graft was confir
med by a renal biopsy in 1993. Data published in the literature indica
te that the survival rate of amyloidotic graft recipients is worse tha
n those of non-amyloidotic graft recipients. This was confirmed in an
analysis of the current CTS data which showed an impaired survival rat
e at 5-yr of 66 +/- 4% (+/- SE) for patients with amyloidosis (n = 413
) as compared with 86 +/- 1% (p < 0.0001) for patients with glomerulon
ephritis and 84 +/- 1 (p < 0.01) for patients with polycystic kidney d
isease. Graft survival after 5 years was 55 +/- 4% in patients with am
yloidosis as compared with 63 +/- 1% (p = 0.02) in patients with glome
rulonephritis and 68 +/- 1% in patients with polycystic kidney disease
. Graft survival was improved in amyloidotic patients treated with cyl
osporine as compared with patients on steroids and azathioprine (55 +/
- 4% vs. 38 +/- 8%, p < 0.05). It is concluded that renal transplantat
ion is the renal replacement therapy of choice for patients with AA-ty
pe amyloidosis although the overall patient survival is impaired in co
mparison with patients with other diseases.