The subsuming of eminently soluble local conflicts on scarce natural r
esources or environmental issues under the rubric of 'security' brings
in a wrong orientation and wrong actors into the scene, and makes con
flict-resolution more difficult and harmony less likely. The further c
ategorisation of this as a question of 'regional security' is fraught
with the danger of bringing such conflicts within the ambit of post-co
ld war American concepts of 'regional trouble spots' and their possibl
e bearing on the perceived American interests in the regions concerned
. The academic community should be wary of being co-opted into providi
ng a theoretical underpinning for this.