Like many large US metropolitan areas, the San Francisco Bay Area has
experienced rapid suburban employment growth since 1980, much of it co
ncentrated in sub-centres. This paper shows that, contrary to the co-l
ocation hypothesis, employment decentralisation has not been associate
d with shorter average commute distances or durations in the Bay Area.
Combining statistics on shifts in modal splits and average vehicle oc
cupancy levels reveals that parallelling the region's sub-centring tre
nd has been a substantial increase in average commute vehicle miles tr
avelled (VMT) per employee between 1980 and 1990. The largest increase
s occurred in the fastest-growing and most remote suburban centres, Us
ing decomposition analysis, we found that increasing commute distances
contributed the most to rising commute VMT per employee, and the dist
ance factor had proportionately the greatest effect on rising commute
VMT rates in the most peripheral work centres, Since shifts in commute
VMT per employee are thought to be strongly associated with transport
externalities, we conclude that the social and environmental implicat
ions of the Bay Area's regional growth trends deserve more public poli
cy attention than given to date.