The rubric of sustainable development has now gained wide theoretical
and political acceptance in the global community. However, after the R
io Declaration, each nation must now confront the specific question of
how to decide between those industries and activities that are sustai
nable and those that are not when conflicting social and ecological in
terests are at stake. Any fundamental change to resource allocation wi
ll have social distributional consequences, and the issue of justice t
herefore becomes a critical element of any sustainability formulation.
This paper contributes to this debate by exploring the potential for
a politically grounded theory of justice in and to the environment. Mo
re specifically, we argue for a situated analysis that nevertheless re
tains the postulate of a neo-Kantian universal ethic as the foundation
for,global institutions that could integrate and safeguard the princi
ples of justice and ecological responsibility underpinning most notion
s of sustainability. We show this by locating the question of justice
in a particular conflict of interest, that between the Australian mini
ng giant Broken Hill Proprietary, Ltd., and the traditional landowners
of an area on the Ok Tedi river in Papua New Guinea.