Jp. Zetterstrom et al., PERINEAL BODY MEASUREMENT IMPROVES EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR SPHINCTER LESIONS DURING ENDOANAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 41(6), 1998, pp. 705-713
Endoanal ultrasonography has become an important tool in the evaluatio
n of patients with anal incontinence. However, the extent of anterior
defects is sometimes difficult to quantitate during endoanal ultrasono
graphy. PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate perineal body mea
surement during endoanal ultrasonography in assessing patients with ob
stetric anal sphincter injuries. METHODS: Forty-two patients with anal
incontinence because of obstetric sphincter injuries and 13 asymptoma
tic subjects were investigated with endoanal ultrasonography. Sphincte
r muscle thickness, sphincter defects, and perineal body were measured
. Perineal body measurement was performed by inserting a finger, held
gently against the posterior vaginal wall, into the vagina and measuri
ng the distance between the inner surface of the internal sphincter an
d the ultrasonographic reflection of the finger. RESULTS: Ah patients
had anterior sphincter lesions of varying extent. Mean size of interna
l sphincter lesions was 146 degrees, and mean size of external sphinct
er lesions was 107 degrees (P < 0.001). Perineal body measurement was
performed without difficulty in all patients and subjects. Perineal bo
dy measurement (mean standard deviation) was 6 +/- 2 mm in patients an
d 12 +/- 3 mm in asymptomatic subjects (P < 0.001). Ninety-three perce
nt of patients had perineal body measurement less than or equal to 10
mm, and 70 percent of asymptomatic subjects had perineal body measurem
ent >10 mm. Digital delineation of the perineal body during endoanal u
ltrasonography improved the visualization of sphincter lesions in 74 p
ercent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Digital delineation of the perineal b
ody during endoanal ultrasonography improved the visualization of sphi
ncter lesions in the majority of patients. Perineal body measurement i
s performed without difficulty and is a good predictor of anterior sph
incter lesions. Use of this technique improves visualization of sphinc
ter lesions.