PERINEAL BODY MEASUREMENT IMPROVES EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR SPHINCTER LESIONS DURING ENDOANAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY

Citation
Jp. Zetterstrom et al., PERINEAL BODY MEASUREMENT IMPROVES EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR SPHINCTER LESIONS DURING ENDOANAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 41(6), 1998, pp. 705-713
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology",Surgery
ISSN journal
00123706
Volume
41
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
705 - 713
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(1998)41:6<705:PBMIEO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Endoanal ultrasonography has become an important tool in the evaluatio n of patients with anal incontinence. However, the extent of anterior defects is sometimes difficult to quantitate during endoanal ultrasono graphy. PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate perineal body mea surement during endoanal ultrasonography in assessing patients with ob stetric anal sphincter injuries. METHODS: Forty-two patients with anal incontinence because of obstetric sphincter injuries and 13 asymptoma tic subjects were investigated with endoanal ultrasonography. Sphincte r muscle thickness, sphincter defects, and perineal body were measured . Perineal body measurement was performed by inserting a finger, held gently against the posterior vaginal wall, into the vagina and measuri ng the distance between the inner surface of the internal sphincter an d the ultrasonographic reflection of the finger. RESULTS: Ah patients had anterior sphincter lesions of varying extent. Mean size of interna l sphincter lesions was 146 degrees, and mean size of external sphinct er lesions was 107 degrees (P < 0.001). Perineal body measurement was performed without difficulty in all patients and subjects. Perineal bo dy measurement (mean standard deviation) was 6 +/- 2 mm in patients an d 12 +/- 3 mm in asymptomatic subjects (P < 0.001). Ninety-three perce nt of patients had perineal body measurement less than or equal to 10 mm, and 70 percent of asymptomatic subjects had perineal body measurem ent >10 mm. Digital delineation of the perineal body during endoanal u ltrasonography improved the visualization of sphincter lesions in 74 p ercent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Digital delineation of the perineal b ody during endoanal ultrasonography improved the visualization of sphi ncter lesions in the majority of patients. Perineal body measurement i s performed without difficulty and is a good predictor of anterior sph incter lesions. Use of this technique improves visualization of sphinc ter lesions.