C. Brinkschmidt et al., COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION AND TELOMERASE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS IDENTIFY 2 BIOLOGICALLY DIFFERENT GROUPS OF 4S NEUROBLASTOMAS, British Journal of Cancer, 77(12), 1998, pp. 2223-2229
Chromosomal aberrations of 20 stage 4s neuroblastomas were analysed by
comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), In a subset of 13/20 tumours
, telomerase activity was evaluated by the telomeric repeat amplificat
ion protocol (TRAP). The CGH data were compared with the CGH results o
f ten stage 1 and 2 (stage 1/2) and 22 stage 3 and 4 (stage 3/4) neuro
blastomas. A total of 17/20 stage 4s neuroblastomas did not progress c
linically, whereas tumour progression with lethal outcome occurred in
3/20 cases. The CGH data of clinically non-progressing stage 4s tumour
s revealed a high rate of whole-chromosome aberrations (73.4%) with an
overrepresentation of mainly chromosomes 2, 6, 7, 12, 13, 17, 18 and
an underrepresentation of mainly chromosomes 3, 4, 11, 14. MYCN amplif
ication or Ip deletion was observed in only 1/27 or 2/17 clinically no
n-progressing stage 4s tumours respectively, whereas all three progres
sive stage 4s neuroblastomas showed MYCN amplification, 1p deletion an
d, in 2/3 cases, distal 17q gains. Except for one case, telomerase act
ivity was not observed in non-progressing stage 4s neuroblastomas. In
contrast, 4s tumours with lethal outcome revealed elevated telomerase
activity levels. Our data suggest that stage 4s neuroblastomas belong
to two biologically different groups, one of which displays the geneti
c features of localized stage 112 tumours, whereas the other mimics ad
vanced stage 3/4 neuroblastomas.