This overview of the law of Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, South
Africa, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe shows that while the right to s
trike is recognized by all, its exercise remains subject to many restr
ictions, Even where the right is provided for in the Constitution, sta
tutory limitations include broadly defined essential services, prohibi
tion of strikes over rights disputes and inhibitive procedural require
ments. Madhuku attributes this restrictive regime to the perception th
at more liberal legislation might prove economically disruptive. What
protection is accorded the right to strike in the region owes much to
the standard-setting work of the ILO.