W. Deinsberger et al., SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIAL MONITORING DURING POSITIONING OF THE PATIENT FOR POSTERIOR-FOSSA SURGERY IN THE SEMISITTING POSITION, Neurosurgery, 43(1), 1998, pp. 36-40
OBJECTIVE: Midcervical flexion myelopathy is a rare but well-known com
plication of posterior fossa surgery. To reduce the risk, we routinely
used somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring during position
ing of the patient. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients were oper
ated on for posterior fossa lesions in the semisitting position via a
median (5 patients) or a lateral (50 patients) suboccipital approach.
During positioning, monitoring of SSEPs by stimulation of the tibial n
erve (T-SSEP) as well as by stimulation of the median nerve (M-SSEP) w
as established. In the case of pronounced SSEP changes, the head was r
epositioned. Surgery was started after SSEP recordings were unchanged
as compared to the baseline investigation. RESULTS: Effective monitori
ng was possible in all cases. Whereas M-SSEP recordings showed no chan
ges while placing patients in the sitting position, T-SSEP recordings
were altered in 14 cases (25%). In cases using the midline approach, S
SEP changes were never so pronounced to require repositioning of the h
ead. Head flexion and rotation resulted in significant changes of T-SS
EP recordings in eight patients (14.5 %), requiring repositioning. In
two cases, an amplitude loss was noted. In only two of these eight pat
ients were M-SSEP recordings markedly changed. SSEP recordings after r
epositioning disclosed recovery of spinal cord function. In no patient
were clinical signs of myelopathy observed postoperatively. CONCLUSIO
N: We observed a high incidence of pronounced changes of T-SSEP record
ings when the patient's head was flexed and rotated for lateral subocc
ipital craniotomy in the semisitting position. Despite the low specifi
city monitoring of T-SSEPs during positioning of the patient for poste
rior fossa surgery, the semisitting position is strongly recommended.