Mm. Goodsitt et al., CLASSIFICATION OF COMPRESSED BREAST SHAPES FOR THE DESIGN OF EQUALIZATION FILTERS IN X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY, Medical physics, 25(6), 1998, pp. 937-948
We are developing an external filter method for equalizing the x-ray e
xposure in mammography. Each filter is specially designed to match the
shape of the compressed breast border and to preferentially attenuate
the x-ray beam in the peripheral region of the breast. To be practica
l, this method should require the use of only a limited number of cust
om built filters. It is hypothesized that this would be possible if co
mpressed breasts can be classified into a finite number of shapes. A s
tudy was performed to determine the number of shapes. Based on the par
abolic appearances of the outer borders of compressed breasts in mammo
grams, the borders were fit with the polynomial equations y = ax(2) bx(3) and y = ax(2) + bx(3) + cx(4). The goodness-of-fit of these equa
tions was compared. The a,b and a,b,c coefficients were employed in a
K-Means clustering procedure to classify 470 CC-view and 484 MLO-view
borders into 2-10 clusters. The mean coefficients of the borders withi
n a given cluster defined the ''filter'' shape, and the individual bor
ders were translated and rotated to best match that filter shape. The
average rms differences between the individual borders and the ''filte
r'' were computed as were the standard deviations of those differences
. The optimally shifted and rotated borders were refit with the above
polynomial equations, and plotted for visual evaluation of clustering
success. Both polynomial fits were adequate with rms errors of about 2
mm for the 2-coefficient equation, and about 1 mm for the 3-coefficie
nt equation. Although the fits to the original borders were superior f
or the 3-coefficient equation, the matches to the ''filter'' borders d
etermined by clustering were not significantly improved. A variety of
modified clustering methods were developed and utilized, but none prod
uced major improvements in clustering. Results indicate that 3 or 4 fi
lter shapes may be adequate for each mammographic projection (CC and M
LO-view). To account for the wide variations in exposures observed at
the peripheral regions of breasts classified to be of a particular sha
pe, it may be necessary to employ different filters for thin, medium a
nd thick breasts. Even with this added requirement, it should be possi
ble to use a small number of filters as desired. (C) 1998 American Ass
ociation of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(98)00106-0].