Tj. Albert et al., ACCURACY OF SPECT SCANNING IN DIAGNOSING PSEUDARTHROSIS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY, Journal of spinal disorders, 11(3), 1998, pp. 197-199
The present study attempted to analyze the efficacy of single photon e
mission computed tomography (SPECT) in diagnosing pseudoarthrosis afte
r fusion using surgical exploration as the gold standard. This study e
xamined the SPECT scans of 38 patients before they underwent surgical
exploration of their fusion mass for suspected pseudoarthrosis or in c
onjunction with instrumentation removal. Surgical findings were compar
ed with the radiologists' findings to determine the efficacy of SPECT
in diagnosing pseudoarthrosis. Radiographic determination of pseudoart
hrosis has been difficult after attempted fusion of the spine. Multipl
e radiographic modalities have been touted as accurate depicters of th
e failure of spinal fusion. However, no method has been found to be hi
ghly accurate in the clinical setting. Thirty-eight patients (mean age
= 42.8, 21 males/17 females, 35 of 38 with instrumentation) underwent
SPECT scans before surgical exploration of their fusion mass for susp
ected pseudoarthrosis or in conjunction with instrumentation removal a
s part of this prospective study. The average interval from their fusi
on procedure until their SPECT scan was 23.9 months (range, 9-120 mont
hs). All surgical findings were recorded with regard to solidity of th
e fusion and the level of the possible pseudoarthrosis. All SPECT scan
s were read at a time after surgery by an independent nuclear radiolog
ist who had not read their SPECT scans before surgery and who did not
know the results of exploration. Results of the radiologist's reading
were then compared with surgical exploration findings, and sensitivity
and specificity was calculated. There were 24 solid fusions and 14 ps
eudoarthroses. SPECT scans correctly identified 7 of the 14 pseudoarth
roses and 14 of the 24 solid fusions. This represents a sensitivity of
0.50 and a specificity of 0.58. SPECT scanning correctly diagnosed th
e one solid fusion and two pseudoarthrosis patients in the three patie
nts who had no instrumentation. This study demonstrates that SPECT sca
nning alone is inaccurate in diagnosing pseudoarthrosis when using sur
gical exploration as the gold standard. Given recent pressures for cos
t containment, we cannot recommend SPECT scanning as a routine modalit
y for use in the diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis. We cannot define the ac
curacy of SPECT scanning used together with computed tomography scans,
plain films, or other radiographic modalities in the diagnosis of pse
udoarthrosis.