Gj. Vanderwildt et Dp. Bergsma, VISUAL-FIELD ENLARGEMENT BY NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TRAINING OF A HEMIANOPIA PATIENT, Documenta ophthalmologica, 93(4), 1997, pp. 277-292
A 58-year old hemianopsia patient was submitted to a two-fold neuropsy
chological training in order to enhance visual functions in the affect
ed part of his visual field. At first, the visual field was measured p
erimetrically, to serve as a starting measurement with which after-mea
surements could be compared. Then, the first training was started: the
border area between the intact and the defect visual field was being
stimulated by small light spots. The training consisted of repetitive
detection threshold measurements. After 27 one-hour sessions, the visu
al field was being measured again. The visual field appeared to have b
een enlarged 5 to 12 degrees in the direction of the affected hemifiel
d and contrast-sensitivity thresholds to have been decreased almost at
every point in the stimulus-array. Then, a second training started; a
n eye-movement training. Again, the border area, now shifted outwards,
was stimulated. This time, the stimulus concerned a short presentatio
n of light (< 200 msec.) after which the subject, to the best of his a
bilities had to make an eye-movement to the perceived stimulus-site. A
lso, he had to categorize the quality of his perception as well as the
direction in which the stimulus was thought to be perceived. After 30
sessions, the visual field appeared to have 'grown' just a little bit
more, but this seems not to be a significant enlargement. More import
ant, the number of detected stimuli in the supposed 'blind' area had i
ncreased, as had the accuracy of the localization of the stimuli. Prel
iminary results of the detection training of a second subject, also 58
years of age, are presented. Finally, planned actions are discussed.