D. Leenhardt et al., EVALUATING IRRIGATION STRATEGIES FOR LETTUCE BY SIMULATION - 2 - NITROGEN BUDGET, European journal of agronomy, 8(3-4), 1998, pp. 267-282
A mechanistic water-flow, solute transport and crop growth model was u
sed to compare three irrigation strategies for lettuce in French Medit
erranean conditions: (1) the current strategy based on the occurrence
of rainfall, (2) a strategy based on a simplified modelling of the soi
l water balance and (3) a strategy based on tensiometer readings. Wate
r and solute instantaneous fluxes versus time were simulated for two g
rowing periods (summer and autumn) over 100 years. The climatic data w
ere provided by a weather generator. Leenhardt et al. (1998) compared
the three strategies with regard to their effects on water flows in th
e soil. The present paper deals with their effects on the nitrogen bal
ance and particularly nitrate leaching. The three strategies rank simi
larly for all processes of the N cycle. Strategy 1 generates soil wate
r content conditions favourable to denitrification and nitrate leachin
g and less favourable to mineralisation and nitrification, leading to
a low NO(3)(- )availability for the crop, and thus a low nitrate uptak
e. Strategy 1 minimizes the water stress but induces the maximum nitro
gen stress. At the other extreme is strategy 3, whereas strategy 2 has
an intermediate position, but closer, however, to strategy 3 than 1.
A direct conclusion would suggest avoiding strategy 1 and choosing str
ategy 3. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.