In reaction to claims that educational systems in the USA are not resp
onding well to the needs of learners, school districts have responded
with a highly diverse set of 'reform activities' ranging from increase
d focus on incremental improvements in programs to a variety of struct
ural changes. A few educators began to 'think systemically', that is,
they began to take systems principles into account as change efforts w
ere designed and planned. Such educators have been able to obtain both
guidance and encouragement from system philosophers, designers, and p
ractitioners who are spearheading the emergence of a new technology co
ncerned with the design of social systems. But, the challenge of rethi
nking how systems that redesign themselves might be evaluated has rece
ived too little attention. Like the mismatch believed to exist between
current educational practice and the needs of learners, there is also
a mismatch between traditional evaluation theory and practice and the
need for new theory, models, and methodology for evaluating new syste
m designs. This paper addresses this issue by proposing a framework fo
r evaluating educational system designs. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, L
td.