In this paper it is argued, with reference to research conducted at Gr
eat Ormond Street, that the assessment and treatment of young sex offe
nders is most usefully conceptualized within a systemic framework. Fro
m this perspective abuse is viewed as occurring within the context of
a trauma organized system which includes the perpetrators and victims
of sexual abuse and may also include members of their family, social a
nd professional networks. Members of trauma organized systems collude
in denying the abuse and both silencing and blaming the victim. A syst
emic approach to intervention which aims to disrupt the processes of d
enial and silencing begins with crisis intervention. This is followed
by comprehensive family assessment. The capacity of families of adoles
cent sex offenders to respond to treatment may be assessed as hopeful,
doubtful or hopeless depending upon the degree to which the perpetrat
or accepts responsibility for the abuse, the parents accept responsibi
lity for failing to protect the victim and the family shows a capacity
to engage in treatment. Treatment programmes conceptualized within a
systemic framework involve individual or group therapy for the perpetr
ators, victims, siblings and parents with concurrent family interventi
on involving both dyadic sind whole-family sessions. Individual or gro
up work for perpetrators focus on the perpetrator's denial, abuse of p
ower, personal trauma experiences, and personal attachment disruption,
since our research shows that many adolescent perpetrators have thems
elves been exposed to physical or sexual violence and have experienced
disrupted attachments. Concurrent family work focuses on protection o
f victims and siblings, role clarification, fostering parental support
of both the perpetrator and the victim and facilitating the perpetrat
or in making a full apology to the victim. Victims participate in conc
urrent trauma and self-protection work to prepare them for engaging in
the apology process. Planned family reunification is the final stage
of systemic intervention. This is only appropriate in those cases wher
e there is clear evidence that the trauma organized system has been re
placed by a system of family and professional relationships in which t
he well-being of the victim and siblings is safeguarded.