A simple argument by Hedman shows that the diameter of a clique graph
G differs by at most one from that of K(G), its clique graph. Hedman d
escribed examples of a graph G such that diam(K(G)) = diam(G) + 1 and
asked in general about the existence of graphs such that diam(KZ(G)) =
diam(G) + i. Examples satisfying this equality for i = 2 have been de
scribed by Peyrat, Rall, and Slater and independently by Balakrishnan
and Pauiraja. The authors of the former work also solved the case i =
3 and i = 4 and conjectured that such graphs exist for every positive
integer i. The cases i greater than or equal to 5 remained open. In th
e present article, we prove their conjecture. For each positive intege
r i, we describe a family of graphs G such that diam(K-i(G)) = diam(G)
+ i. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.