Taken together, the works of Jurgen Habermas and Michel Foucault highl
ight an essential tension in modernity. This is the tension between th
e normative and the real, between what should be done and what is actu
ally done. Understanding this tension is crucial to understanding mode
rn democracy, what it is and what it could be. It has been argued that
an effective way of making democracy stronger is to strengthen civil
society. This article contains a comparative analysis of the central i
deas of Habermas and Foucault as they pertain to the question of democ
racy and civil society. More specifically, the discourse ethics of Hab
ermas is contrasted with the power analytics and ethics of Foucault ev
aluating their usefulness for those interested in understanding, and b
ringing about, democratic social change.