A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF TRUE-POSITIVE VERSUS FALSE-NEGATIVE CERVICAL SMEARS IN WOMEN WITH CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (CIN) III

Citation
Jp. Osullivan et al., A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF TRUE-POSITIVE VERSUS FALSE-NEGATIVE CERVICAL SMEARS IN WOMEN WITH CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (CIN) III, Cytopathology, 9(3), 1998, pp. 155-161
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,"Cell Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
09565507
Volume
9
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
155 - 161
Database
ISI
SICI code
0956-5507(1998)9:3<155:ACSOTV>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Cervical smears (n = 150) from five departments showing high-grade dys karyosis were examined by three cytologists. All the smears came from patients with biopsy-proven CIN III. One hundred had been correctly re ported (true positives) but 50 had originally been reported as negativ e and had been found to be positive only on review (false negatives). There were significant differences between the two sets in the charact eristics of the dyskaryotic cell population. The false-negative smears tended to have fewer than 200 dyskaryotic cells. The nuclei of the dy skaryotic cells tended to have fine rather than coarse nuclear chromat in. A smear with fewer than 50 dyskaryotic cells is 26 times more like ly to be reported as negative than one with more than 200 dyskaryotic cells. The results suggest that there is a type of severely dyskaryoti c smear that is inherently likely to be missed on routine screening. ( C) 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd.