Georgescu-Roegen's work is usually divided into two categories, his ea
rlier work on consumer and production theory and his later concern wit
h entropy and bioeconomics beginning with his 1966 introductory essay
to his collected theoretical papers published in the volume Analytical
Economics. Most economists usually praise his earlier work on pure th
eory and ignore his later work which is highly critical of neoclassica
l economics. Those economists sympathetic to his later work usually ta
ke the position that he ''saw the light'' and gave up neoclassical the
ory some time in the 1960s to turn his attention to the issues of reso
urce scarcity and social institutions. It is argued here that there is
an unbroken path running from Georgescu's work in pure theory in the
1930s, 1930s, and 1950s, through his writings on peasant economies in
the 1960s, lending to his preoccupation with entropy and bioeconomics
in the last 25 years of his life. That common thread is his preoccupat
ion with ''valuation.'' The choices our species makes about resource u
se and the distribution of economic output depends upon our valuation
framework. Georgescu-Roegen's work begins in the 1930s with a critical
examination of the difficulties with the hedonistic valuation framewo
rk of neoclassical economics, moves in the 1960s to the conflict betwe
en social and hedonistic valuation, and culminates in the 1970s and 19
80s with his examination of the conflict between individual, social, a
nd environmental values. This paper traces the evolution of Georgescu-
Roegen's thought about valuation and the environmental and social poli
cy recommendations which arise out of his bioeconomic framework.