Sheep brucellosis, a zoonosis mainly due to B. melitensis (biovar 1, 2
or 3), remains widespread world-wide. Pathologically and epidemiologi
cally, the disease is very similar to B. abortus infection in cattle.
The live B. melitensis Rev 1 strain is currently considered as the bes
t vaccine available for the control of sheep brucellosis, especially w
hen used at the standard dose by the conjunctival route. Used exhausti
vely in whole-flock vaccination programmes, it induces a great decreas
e in the prevalence in both sheep and human populations. The expensive
test-and-slaughter strategy should be restricted to the lowest infect
ed areas. Whenever possible, Brucella spp. should be isolated by cultu
re using adequate selective media from uterine discharges, aborted fet
uses, udder secretions or selected tissues, such as lymph nodes, teste
s or epididymides. Species and biovar identification is routinely base
d on cultural criteria, on lysis by phages and on simple biochemical a
nd serological tests. The recently developed polymerase chain reaction
methods provide additional means of detection and identification. Des
pite the high degree of DNA homology within the genus Brucella, severa
l methods, including PCR-RFLP and Southern blot, have been developed w
hich allow, to a certain extent, the differentiation between Brucella
species and some of their biovars. While several ELISA tests have been
developed recently, the rose bengal plate agglutination and complemen
t fixation tests, based on the detection of anti-S-LPS antibody, are s
till recommended for screening flocks and individuals. However, these
tests sometimes lack specificity or sensitivity. For pooled samples, t
here: are no useful tests such as the milk ring test in cattle. The br
ucellin allergic skin test can be used as a screening or complementary
test in unvaccinated flocks, provided that a purified, lipopolysaccha
ride (LPS)-free and standardized antigen preparation is used. (C) Inra
/Elsevier, Paris.