Objective. To compare the strength of two types of fixation method for
calcaneal fractures. Design. A biomechanical testing examined the sta
bility of 12 fractured calcaneal specimens fixed with two different me
thods. Background. Though anatomic reduction and internal fixation for
the treatment of intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus has become
popular, biomechanical data on the fixation strength is lacking. Meth
ods. Twenty fresh frozen specimens of amputated human legs were impact
ed by a 20 kg weight dropped from a 155 cm height to create calcaneal
fractures. Twelve specimens which demonstrated a longitudinal and a tr
ansverse primary fracture lines were selected for open reduction and i
nternal fixation. Group 1: a lateral buttress plate and parallel screw
s placed in the latero-medial direction were used. Group 2: a longitud
inal screw was added in addition to the fixation used in group 1. Biom
echanical testing was performed by applying a tibial shank load until
the internal fixation failed. Results. All mechanical failures of the
reconstructed calcaneus occurred through the transverse primary fractu
re line. The average failure load was 805 +/- 356 N in group 1 and 290
5 +/- 910 N in group 2 (Wilcoxon p <0.05). Conclusions. A longitudinal
transfixing screw could significantly improve the stability of the tr
ansverse primary fracture line in calcaneal fractures. Relevance. A lo
ngitudinal screw is recommended for clinical use so that early range o
f motion can be instituted post-operatively. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science
Ltd. All rights reserved.