G. Orlova et S. Scheiner, INTERMOLECULAR H-CENTER-DOT-CENTER-DOT-CENTER-DOT-H BONDING AND PROTON-TRANSFER IN SEMISANDWICH RE AND RU COMPLEXES, The journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory, 102(25), 1998, pp. 4813-4818
The reactions of transition metal (TM) hydrides (Cp)Re(H)(NO)(CO), (Cp
)Ru(H)(CO)(PH3), and (Cp)Re(H)(NO)(PH3) with poor, moderate, and stron
g proton donors HR (H2O, HOCF3, and H3O+) are studied using DFT B3PW91
. The reaction pathway depends on the relative proton-attracting power
s of the TM and hydride H atoms, as well as on the proton donor abilit
y of HR. In the case where these two atoms have comparable basicity, (
Cp)Re(H)(NO)(CO) forms an intermolecular H ... H bonding intermediate
upon reaction with both poor and strong proton donors H2O and H3O+. Th
is is followed by rearrangement to eta(2)-H-2 by proton transfer over
a very small barrier. The reaction of (Cp)Ru(H)(CO)(PH3) with its high
ly nucleophilic hydride yields H ... H bonding complexes with moderate
proton donor HOCF3, whereas the strong donor H3O+ produces only the e
ta(2)-H-2 structure. Rapid rearrangement of eta(2)-H-2 to cis-dihydrid
e is possible although the trans-dihydride is mon stable. For both typ
es of hydride, a reaction pathway through a H ... H bonding complex is
preferred over direct interaction of HR with the TM atom, forming the
corresponding dihydride. The latter pathway is favored for (Cp)Re(H)(
NO)(PH3), where the TM atom is the more basic. In this case cis- and t
rans-dihydride complexes form upon reaction with H3O+ without any H ..
. H and eta(2)-H-2 intermediates. Although the trans-structure is more
stable than the cis-, a PH3 ligand favors the cis-direction of H3O+ a
ttack by recoordination of H2O from the hydride atom to a hydrogen of
the PH3 group.