P. Vindras et al., POINTING ERRORS REFLECT BIASES IN THE PERCEPTION OF THE INITIAL HAND POSITION, Journal of neurophysiology, 79(6), 1998, pp. 3290-3294
By comparing the visuomotor performance of 10 adult, normal subjects i
n three tasks, we investigated whether errors in pointing movements re
flect biased estimations of the hand starting position. In a manual po
inting task with no visual feedback, subjects aimed at 48 targets spac
ed regularly around two starting positions. Nine subjects exhibited a
similar pattern of systematic errors across targets, i.e., a parallel
shift of the end points that accounted, on average, for 49% of the tot
al variability. The direction of the shift depended on the starting lo
cation. Systematic errors decreased dramatically in the second conditi
on where subjects were allowed to see their hand before movement onset
. The third task was to use a joystick held by the left hand to estima
te the location of their (unseen) right hand. The systematic perceptua
l errors in this condition were found to be highly correlated with the
motor errors in the first condition. The results support the followin
g conclusions. I) Kinesthetic estimation of hand position may be consi
stently biased. Some of the mechanisms responsible for these biases ar
e always active, irrespective of whether position is estimated overtly
(e.g., with a matching paradigm), or covertly as part of the motor pl
anning for aimed movements. 2) Pointing errors reflect to a significan
t extent the erroneous estimation of initial hand position. This sugge
sts that aimed hand movements are planned vectorially, i.e., in terms
of distance and direction, rather than in terms of absolute position i
n space.