Kl. Wuensch et Gm. Poteat, EVALUATING THE MORALITY OF ANIMAL RESEARCH - EFFECTS OF ETHICAL IDEOLOGY, GENDER, AND PURPOSE, Journal of social behavior and personality, 13(1), 1998, pp. 139-150
College students (N = 315) were asked to pretend that they were servin
g on a university research committee hearing a complaint against anima
l research being conducted by a member of the university faculty. Five
different research scenarios were used: Testing cosmetics, basic theo
ry testing, agricultural (meat production) research, veterinary resear
ch, and medical research. Participants were asked to rate how justifie
d they thought the research was and to decide whether or not the resea
rch should be halted. An ethical inventory was used to measure partici
pants' idealism and relativism. Idealism was negatively associated and
relativism positively associated with support for animal research. Wo
men were much less accepting of animal research than were men. Support
for the cosmetic, theoretical, and agricultural research projects was
significantly less than that for the medical research.