Djr. Hildicksmith et al., CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY FROM THE RADIAL ARTERY - EXPERIENCE, COMPLICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS, International journal of cardiology, 64(3), 1998, pp. 231-239
Aims: to assess the outcomes, complications and limitations of coronar
y angiography performed via percutaneous radial artery puncture. Metho
ds and results: two hundred and fifty patients underwent diagnostic co
ronary angiography from the radial artery, 182 (72.8%) of whom had con
traindications to the femoral approach, for example due to peripheral
vascular disease (n=85), therapeutic anticoagulation (29), or failed f
emoral approach (17). Procedural success in this high-risk population
was achieved in 231 patients (92.4%). Principle reasons for failure we
re unsuccessful radial access (5) and arterial spasm (5). Procedure du
ration (SD) for an operator's first 20 cases compared with cases there
after (min) was 47.7 (16.7) vs. 41.5 (14.6), P=0.0004; fluoroscopy tim
e (min) 9.7 (7.1) vs. 6.6 (5.1), P=0.0001 and procedural success 89.6%
vs. 94.1%, P=ns. Complications included two deaths associated tempora
lly with catheterisation, three cases of arterial dissection without i
schaemic sequelae and one transient ischaemic attack. Conclusions: cor
onary angiography can be performed successfully from the radial artery
, but this approach has limitations, which include the need to demonst
rate dual palmar vascular supply, the prolonged learning phase, the pr
ocedural failure rate, patient discomfort and a demonstrable incidence
of vascular and haemodynamic complications. We believe that radial co
ronary angiography should only be undertaken when there is a contraind
ication to the femoral approach. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd
.