G. Apolone et al., EVALUATION OF THE EORTC QLQ-C30 QUESTIONNAIRE - A COMPARISON WITH SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY IN A COHORT OF ITALIAN LONG-SURVIVAL CANCER-PATIENTS, Annals of oncology, 9(5), 1998, pp. 549-557
Background: Despite the large amount of data available about the EORTC
QLQ-C30 questionnaire, there have been very few studies focussed on l
ong-survival cancer patients, and no data are available on its perform
ance in the Italian setting. Patients and il?methods. Within the frame
work of a project aimed at evaluating the characteristics of available
HR-QOL questionnaires in the Italian language, the EORTC QLQ-C30 ques
tionnaire together with the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) w
ere mail-administered to a sample of patients previously recruited in
two large multicenter randomized clinical trials on early breast and c
olon cancers. The properties of the questionnaire were evaluated using
standard psychometric techniques and correlation analyses with demogr
aphic and clinical independent variables. Results. In the sample of pa
tients who sent back the questionnaires under evaluation, the EORTC QL
Q-C30 showed satisfactory acceptability (response rate = 64% and very
low prevalence of missing at item and scale level), and the psychometr
ic analyses confirmed the multi-dimensional conceptualisation in terms
of convergent and discriminant validity. Moreover, EORTC QLQ-C30 scal
es showed substantial correlation with the homologous SF-36 scales. Fe
w socio-demographic (age, gender, schooling) and clinical (type of can
cer disease) variables were associated with HR-QOL. Breast cancer pati
ents reported, on average: worse physical health-related scores, but a
fter adjustment for age and education, most of the differences disappe
ared. Conclusions: These findings confirm the validity and robustness
of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in this sample of long-survival Italian cancer pa
tients. Further ad hoc validation studies are required to evaluate its
significance in these particular patients.