Sj. Froum et al., COMPARISON OF BIOACTIVE GLASS SYNTHETIC BONE-GRAFT PARTICLES AND OPENDEBRIDEMENT IN THE TREATMENT OF HUMAN PERIODONTAL DEFECTS - A CLINICAL-STUDY, Journal of periodontology, 69(6), 1998, pp. 698-709
THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY was to compare the repair response of bioact
ive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the t
reatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty-nine defects in 1
6 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with
attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographic evide
nce of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after cause-rel
ated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), th
e following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depth
s, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was
surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height
and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioac
tive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were
sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft ti
ssue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At
12 months all sites were surgically re-entered to record osseous meas
urements. At the 12-month evaluation, significantly greater mean probi
ng depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to
the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment
level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive gl
ass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was
significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1
.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was signi
ficantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to th
e control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly gr
eater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control s
ites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant impr
ovement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement.