E. Verrina et al., THE USE OF THE PD ADEQUEST MATHEMATICAL-MODEL IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS ON CHRONIC PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS, Peritoneal dialysis international, 18(3), 1998, pp. 322-328
Objective: To test the accuracy of the PD ADEQUEST kinetic model in ca
lculating peritoneal transport parameters and to quantify the differen
ces between the results of software simulations and direct measurement
s in order to assess the reliability of this tool in chronic peritonea
l dialysis (PD) pediatric patients. Patients:Twenty-nine patients (mea
n age: 10 +/- 4 years; range: 4 - 17), 5 on continuous ambulatory PD,
4 on continuous cycling PD, 19 on nocturnal intermittent PD and 1 in n
octurnal tidal PD, all free from peritonitis in the previous 2 months.
Fourteen patients were anuric and 15 had a mean glomerular filtration
rate of 1.79 +/- 1.23 mL/min, range 0.25 - 4.32. Methods: In all pati
ents, 24-hour dialysate and urine collections associated to standard p
eritoneal equilibration test (PET) were performed using their usual di
alytic regimen and fill volume (1023 +/- 159 mL/m(2) BSA, range 614 -
1361). PD ADEQUEST kinetic parameters were compared with pediatric and
adult data from literature. The measured weekly normalized total crea
tinine clearance (CRCL), weekly total Kt/V, and daily net ultrafiltrat
ion (UF) were compared with corresponding mathematically modeled value
s. Results: Kinetic parameters calculated by the PD ADEQUEST program w
ere comparable to adult and pediatric values from previous studies aft
er normalization for BSA. Measured and modeled CRCL and Kt/V showed a
good agreement [concordance correlation (rc) 0.937 and 0.763, respecti
vely] with limited median percentage absolute errors (11.6% and 10.2%,
respectively). Ultrafiltration showed less favorable results (rc = 0.
600 and median percentage absolute error 45%) probably owing to the wi
de variability of this parameter. When the analysis was restricted to
the peritoneal component, the re coefficients results were 0.745 for C
RCL and 0.512 for Kt/V (median absolute error: 11.6% and 15.2%, respec
tively). Conclusions:The overall findings of our study show that the P
D ADEQUEST kinetic model can be used in pediatric patients for the cal
culation of kinetic indexes and for